定量方法(Quantitative Methods)— 概率论模块 · 第六课
一、本课定位
L119 学了概率分布的基本框架:PMF、PDF、CDF 各自做什么用。本课切入金融领域最核心的连续分布——正态分布。从资产收益率建模到风险管理 VaR,从假设检验到蒙特卡罗模拟,正态分布无处不在。
| 项目 | 说明 |
|---|---|
| 模块 | 2.4 概率论 |
| 前置知识 | L119 概率分布导论(PDF/CDF 概念) |
| 后续衔接 | L121 标准正态分布与 z 分数 |
| 难度 | ★★★★☆ |
| 考试权重 | 高(概念+计算,3-4 题) |
| 阅读时间 | 约 15 分钟 |
二、核心概念
1. 什么是正态分布(Normal Distribution)
直觉引入:
测量 1000 个成年男性的身高。绝大多数人在 170cm 左右,少数人特别矮或特别高,极少数人极端偏矮或偏高。把频率画成柱状图,你会发现一个漂亮的"钟形"——中间高、两边低、左右对称。这就是正态分布的形状。
一句话:正态分布 = 由均值 μ 和标准差 σ 完全定义的钟形对称连续分布。
严格定义:
正态分布的概率密度函数(PDF)为:
$$f(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}} \cdot e^{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}$$
记作:$$X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)$$
其中: - μ(mu)= 总体均值(决定了"钟"的中心位置) - σ(sigma)= 总体标准差(决定了"钟"的胖瘦——离散程度) - σ² = 总体方差
🧠 你不需要记住这个公式本身,但你需要理解:μ 和 σ 这两个参数完全决定了一个正态分布的形状和位置。
2. 正态分布的六大核心性质
| # | 性质 | 含义 | 重要性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ① | 对称性 | 关于均值 μ 完全对称 | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| ② | 均值=中位数=众数 | 三者重合于同一点 | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| ③ | 偏度 = 0 | 左右尾巴一样长,无偏斜 | ⭐⭐ |
| ④ | 峰度 = 3(超额峰度 = 0) | 这是"标准"峰度基准 | ⭐⭐ |
| ⑤ | 尾部渐近 | 曲线向两侧无限延伸但永不触零 | ⭐ |
| ⑥ | 线性可加 | 正态变量的线性组合仍服从正态分布 | ⭐⭐⭐ |
性质②详解——均值=中位数=众数:
| 指标 | 定义 | 正态分布中 |
|---|---|---|
| 均值(Mean) | 所有值的算术平均 | μ |
| 中位数(Median) | 正好在中间的值 | μ(因为对称) |
| 众数(Mode) | 概率密度最高的值 | μ(因为钟形顶点在中心) |
📊 正态分布在中心点"三合一",这是许多金融模型能简化的关键性质。如果某个分布不符合,就不能盲目套用正态假设。
案例 1:正态 vs 非正态识别
某分析师统计了两只基金的月收益率分布:
| 基金 | 均值 | 中位数 | 众数 | 偏度判断 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 基金 A | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 很可能近似正态 |
| 基金 B | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.8% | ❌ 右偏(均值 > 中位数) |
基金 B 均值"被拉高了"——少数高收益月份把平均值往上拽,但大多数月份收益其实不超过 1%。这说明不能用正态分布来建模基金 B。
3. 经验法则:68-95-99.7 规则
这是正态分布最实用的一条规则,考试必考:
| 区间 | 覆盖概率 | 直观说法 |
|---|---|---|
| μ ± 1σ | 约 68.27% | 大约 2/3 |
| μ ± 2σ | 约 95.45% | 大约 95% |
| μ ± 3σ | 约 99.73% | 几乎全部 |
记忆技巧:
μ ± 1σ → 68% (记住"一个 σ 吃 68")
μ ± 2σ → 95% (记住"两个 σ 九五")
μ ± 3σ → 99.7% (记住"三个 σ 几乎全包")
案例 2:股市日收益率
假设 S&P 500 的日收益率近似服从正态分布 N(0.04%, 1.2%²): - μ = 0.04%(平均每天涨 0.04%) - σ = 1.2%(日波动率)
| 场景 | 区间 | 概率 | 实际意义 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 正常日 | -1.16% ~ 1.24% | ≈68% | 大多数日子在此范围内 |
| 较大波动 | -2.36% ~ 2.44% | ≈95% | 约 20 个交易日出现 1 次 |
| 极端波动 | -3.56% ~ 3.64% | ≈99.7% | 约一年出现 1 次 |
📊 如果在 5 个交易日内出现两次跌幅超过 3.56%,这显然不是正态分布能解释的——要么模型假设有问题,要么出现了结构性事件。
案例 3:用 68-95-99.7 快速解题
某正态分布随机变量 X ~ N(100, 25)。即 μ = 100,σ = 5。 问:P(90 < X < 110) = ?
- 90 = 100 − 2×5 = μ − 2σ
- 110 = 100 + 2×5 = μ + 2σ
- 所以 P(90 < X < 110) ≈ 95%
不需要查表,不需要计算器,一眼看出答案。
4. 线性变换保持正态性
正态分布的一个关键性质:正态随机变量的线性组合仍然是正态分布。
如果 X ~ N(μₓ, σₓ²),Y ~ N(μᵧ, σᵧ²),且 X 和 Y 独立:
| 变换 | 结果分布 | 均值 | 方差 |
|---|---|---|---|
| aX + b | N(aμ + b, a²σ²) | aμ + b | a²σ² |
| X + Y | N(μₓ + μᵧ, σₓ² + σᵧ²) | μₓ + μᵧ | σₓ² + σᵧ² |
| X − Y | N(μₓ − μᵧ, σₓ² + σᵧ²) | μₓ − μᵧ | σₓ² + σᵧ² |
⚠️ 关键陷阱:X − Y 的方差也是 σₓ² + σᵧ²(加!不是减!) 方差永远是"波动叠加",不管加减。
案例 4:投资组合收益分布
假设你持有两只独立股票: - 股票 A:月收益 ~ N(2%, 4%²) - 股票 B:月收益 ~ N(1%, 3%²)
等权重组合(各 50%)的组合月收益分布为:
$$R_p = 0.5R_A + 0.5R_B$$
$$R_p \sim N(0.5 \times 2\% + 0.5 \times 1\%, \ 0.5^2 \times 16 + 0.5^2 \times 9)$$
$$R_p \sim N(1.5\%, \ 4 + 2.25 = 6.25\%^2)$$
即组合方差 = 6.25,组合标准差 = 2.5%。
📊 组合均值是简单加权平均(1.5%),但组合标准差(2.5%)低于 A 和 B 的加权平均标准差(0.5×4% + 0.5×3% = 3.5%),体现了分散化降低风险的原理。
5. 正态分布与金融应用
正态分布之所以在金融中如此普遍,有两大原因:
| 原因 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 中心极限定理(CLT) | 独立同分布随机变量的样本均值,在大样本下趋近正态分布——无论原始分布是什么形状 |
| 数学简便性 | 只需 μ 和 σ 两个参数;线性变换后仍是正态;多层加总无需重新建模 |
正态分布的具体金融应用场景:
| 领域 | 应用 | 依赖的正态性质 |
|---|---|---|
| 风险管理 | VaR(在险价值)计算 | 分位数公式 μ + z·σ |
| 衍生品定价 | Black-Scholes 期权定价模型 | 对数收益率正态假设 |
| 资产配置 | Markowitz 均值-方差模型 | 收益正态 + 方差作为风险度量 |
| 业绩归因 | t 检验(α 显著性) | 残差正态性 |
| 蒙特卡罗模拟 | 生成随机情景 | 从 N(μ, σ²) 抽样 |
⚠️ 现实警示: 真实金融数据往往呈现肥尾(fat tails),即极端事件频率高于正态分布预测。2008 年金融危机有力地展示了正态假设的局限性。但正态分布仍然是所有金融模型的逻辑起点。
6. 正态分布 vs 其他常见分布
| 分布 | 对称性 | 偏度 | 尾部特征 | 典型应用 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 正态 N(μ, σ²) | 对称 | 0 | 标准尾部 | 收益率基准模型 |
| 对数正态 | 右偏 | > 0 | 右尾较厚 | 资产价格(永远非负) |
| t 分布 | 对称 | 0 | 肥尾 | 小样本假设检验 |
| 卡方分布 | 右偏 | > 0 | 右尾较厚 | 方差检验 |
L122 会专门讲对数正态分布。核心理解:价格 → 对数正态,收益率 → 正态。
三、核心公式速记
| 概念 | 公式 | 场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 正态分布记法 | X ~ N(μ, σ²) | 通用 |
| 68-95-99.7 规则 | μ±kσ, k=1,2,3 | 快速概率估算 |
| 线性变换 aX+b | N(aμ+b, a²σ²) | 缩放/平移 |
| 独立正态相加 | N(μ₁+μ₂, σ₁²+σ₂²) | 组合/汇总 |
| 独立正态相减 | N(μ₁−μ₂, σ₁²+σ₂²) | 差值分布 |
四、常见陷阱
| ❌ 错误 | ✅ 正确 |
|---|---|
| 认为所有金融数据都是正态的 | 真实收益率常呈肥尾、偏斜;正态是起点,不是真相 |
| X−Y 方差写成 σₓ² − σᵧ² | 方差永远是 σₓ² + σᵧ²(独立时),不管加减 |
| 用 68-95-99.7 查精确概率 | 这是近似值!精确值需要 z 表(L121 会讲) |
| 忘记 σ² 是方差,σ 是标准差 | N(μ, σ²) 第二个参数是方差,不是标准差 |
| 混淆正态与对数正态 | 收益率 ~ 正态;价格 ~ 对数正态 |
五、实战测试
【测试题】
Q1(概念题) 关于正态分布 N(μ, σ²),以下哪项陈述是错误的?
A. 该分布关于均值 μ 完全对称
B. 分布的众数等于 μ
C. 分布的偏度为 0
D. 密度函数 f(x) 在 x = μ ± 2σ 处与横轴相交
Q2(计算题) 某股票周收益率服从正态分布 N(0.3%, 1.6%²)。根据 68-95-99.7 规则,周收益率落在 -2.9% 到 3.5% 之间的概率最接近?
A. 68%
B. 90%
C. 95%
D. 99.7%
Q3(计算题) 已知 X ~ N(50, 64) 和 Y ~ N(30, 36),且 X 与 Y 独立。求 2X − Y 的方差:
A. 128
B. 156
C. 292
D. 292 × √2
Q4(概念题) 分析师发现某基金的月收益率分布中,均值 = 1.2%,中位数 = 0.8%。这最能说明什么?
A. 该基金的收益率服从正态分布
B. 该基金的收益率分布是负偏(左偏)的
C. 该基金的收益率分布是正偏(右偏)的
D. 该基金的收益率波动率为负
【答案与解析】
A1:D
- A ✅ 正态分布完美对称,正确
- B ✅ 众数 = μ(钟形顶点在中心),正确
- C ✅ 对称 ⇒ 偏度 = 0,正确
- D ❌ 正态分布曲线两端渐近趋于横轴,但永不与横轴相交!这是尾部渐近性质
A2:C — 95%
计算过程: - μ = 0.3%,σ = 1.6% - 下界:-2.9% = 0.3% − 2 × 1.6% = μ − 2σ - 上界:3.5% = 0.3% + 2 × 1.6% = μ + 2σ - μ ± 2σ 约覆盖 95%
🧠 关键技巧:看到区间边界先化为 μ ± kσ 的形式,然后对应 68/95/99.7。
A3:C — 292
计算过程: - Var(2X) = 2² × Var(X) = 4 × 64 = 256 - Var(−Y) = (−1)² × Var(Y) = 1 × 36 = 36 - Var(2X − Y) = Var(2X) + Var(−Y) = 256 + 36 = 292
⚠️ 注意:2X − Y 的方差 = 4σₓ² + σᵧ²,是加法!不做减法!
A4:C — 正偏(右偏)
- 均值 (1.2%) > 中位数 (0.8%),说明分布右侧有较长的"尾巴"
- 这意味着少数高收益月份把均值拉上去了
- 正偏(右偏)⇒ 正偏度的方向与尾巴方向一致
- A ❌ 正态分布均值 = 中位数
- B ❌ 负偏则均值 < 中位数
- D ❌ 波动率不能为负
📚 下一课 L121:标准正态分布与 z 分数——如何通过查表精确计算任意区间的概率
Quantitative Methods — Probability Module · Lesson 6
1. Lesson Positioning
L119 covered the fundamental framework of probability distributions: what PMF, PDF, and CDF each do. This lesson dives into the most important continuous distribution in finance—the Normal Distribution. From asset return modeling to risk management VaR, from hypothesis testing to Monte Carlo simulation, the normal distribution is everywhere.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Module | 2.4 Probability |
| Prerequisites | L119 Introduction to Probability Distributions (PDF/CDF concepts) |
| Follow-up | L121 Standard Normal Distribution & z-Score |
| Difficulty | ★★★★☆ |
| Exam Weight | High (concepts + calculations, 3–4 questions) |
| Reading Time | ~15 minutes |
2. Core Concepts
2.1 What Is the Normal Distribution?
Intuition:
Measure the heights of 1,000 adult males. Most fall around 170 cm, a few are notably shorter or taller, and very few are extremely short or tall. Plotting the frequencies as a histogram yields a beautiful "bell shape"—peaked in the middle, tapering on both sides, perfectly symmetric. That is the shape of the normal distribution.
In a nutshell: The normal distribution is a bell-shaped symmetric continuous distribution fully defined by its mean μ and standard deviation σ.
Formal Definition:
The probability density function (PDF) of the normal distribution is:
$$f(x) = \frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}} \cdot e^{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}$$
Notation: $$X \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)$$
Where: - μ (mu) = population mean (determines the center of the bell) - σ (sigma) = population standard deviation (determines the spread of the bell) - σ² = population variance
🧠 You do not need to memorize the PDF formula itself, but you must understand: μ and σ are the only two parameters needed to completely define a normal distribution.
2.2 Six Key Properties of the Normal Distribution
| # | Property | Meaning | Importance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ① | Symmetry | Perfectly symmetric about the mean μ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| ② | Mean = Median = Mode | All three coincide at the same point | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| ③ | Skewness = 0 | Both tails are equally long; no tilt | ⭐⭐ |
| ④ | Kurtosis = 3 (Excess Kurtosis = 0) | The baseline reference for kurtosis | ⭐⭐ |
| ⑤ | Asymptotic Tails | The curve extends infinitely in both directions but never touches zero | ⭐ |
| ⑥ | Linear Additivity | Linear combinations of normal variables are also normally distributed | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Property ② Explained—Mean = Median = Mode:
| Measure | Definition | In a Normal Distribution |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | Arithmetic average of all values | μ |
| Median | Value exactly in the middle | μ (due to symmetry) |
| Mode | Value with the highest probability density | μ (bell peaks at the center) |
📊 The normal distribution's "three-in-one" property at the center is what makes many financial models tractable. If a distribution violates this, you cannot blindly apply the normal assumption.
Example 1: Normal vs. Non-Normal Identification
An analyst compiles the monthly return distributions of two funds:
| Fund | Mean | Median | Mode | Skewness Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund A | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.2% | Likely approximately normal |
| Fund B | 1.5% | 1.0% | 0.8% | ❌ Right-skewed (mean > median) |
Fund B's mean has been "pulled up"—a handful of high-return months drag the average higher, even though most months yield no more than 1%. This means you cannot model Fund B with a normal distribution.
2.3 The Empirical Rule: 68–95–99.7
This is the most practical rule about the normal distribution and a guaranteed exam topic:
| Interval | Coverage Probability | Intuitive Phrase |
|---|---|---|
| μ ± 1σ | ~68.27% | About 2/3 |
| μ ± 2σ | ~95.45% | About 95% |
| μ ± 3σ | ~99.73% | Nearly everything |
Memory Aid:
μ ± 1σ → 68% (think: "one sigma covers 68")
μ ± 2σ → 95% (think: "two sigmas cover 95")
μ ± 3σ → 99.7% (think: "three sigmas cover almost all")
Example 2: Daily Stock Market Returns
Suppose S&P 500 daily returns are approximately normally distributed as N(0.04%, 1.2%²): - μ = 0.04% (average daily gain) - σ = 1.2% (daily volatility)
| Scenario | Interval | Probability | Real-World Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal day | −1.16% ~ 1.24% | ≈68% | Most trading days fall here |
| Large swing | −2.36% ~ 2.44% | ≈95% | ~1 out of every 20 trading days |
| Extreme swing | −3.56% ~ 3.64% | ≈99.7% | ~1 occurrence per year |
📊 If you observe two drops exceeding 3.56% within five trading days, that is clearly not explained by the normal distribution—either the model assumption is wrong, or a structural event has occurred.
Example 3: Quick Calculation Using 68–95–99.7
A normally distributed random variable X ~ N(100, 25). That is, μ = 100, σ = 5. Find: P(90 < X < 110) = ?
- 90 = 100 − 2×5 = μ − 2σ
- 110 = 100 + 2×5 = μ + 2σ
- Therefore P(90 < X < 110) ≈ 95%
No table lookup needed, no calculator required—the answer is immediate.
2.4 Linear Transformations Preserve Normality
A critical property: any linear combination of independent normal random variables is itself normally distributed.
If X ~ N(μₓ, σₓ²) and Y ~ N(μᵧ, σᵧ²), and X and Y are independent:
| Transformation | Resulting Distribution | Mean | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| aX + b | N(aμ + b, a²σ²) | aμ + b | a²σ² |
| X + Y | N(μₓ + μᵧ, σₓ² + σᵧ²) | μₓ + μᵧ | σₓ² + σᵧ² |
| X − Y | N(μₓ − μᵧ, σₓ² + σᵧ²) | μₓ − μᵧ | σₓ² + σᵧ² |
⚠️ Critical Trap: The variance of X − Y is also σₓ² + σᵧ² (addition! not subtraction!) Variances always represent "volatility stacking"—they add regardless of whether you are adding or subtracting the variables.
Example 4: Portfolio Return Distribution
Suppose you hold two independent stocks: - Stock A: monthly return ~ N(2%, 4%²) - Stock B: monthly return ~ N(1%, 3%²)
For an equally-weighted portfolio (50% each), the monthly return distribution is:
$$R_p = 0.5R_A + 0.5R_B$$
$$R_p \sim N(0.5 \times 2\% + 0.5 \times 1\%, \ 0.5^2 \times 16 + 0.5^2 \times 9)$$
$$R_p \sim N(1.5\%, \ 4 + 2.25 = 6.25\%^2)$$
Portfolio variance = 6.25, portfolio standard deviation = 2.5%.
📊 The portfolio mean is a simple weighted average (1.5%), but the portfolio standard deviation (2.5%) is lower than the weighted-average standard deviation (0.5×4% + 0.5×3% = 3.5%), illustrating the diversification benefit of risk reduction.
2.5 The Normal Distribution and Financial Applications
The normal distribution is pervasive in finance for two main reasons:
| Reason | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Central Limit Theorem (CLT) | The sample mean of i.i.d. random variables converges to a normal distribution in large samples—regardless of the shape of the original distribution |
| Mathematical Tractability | Only two parameters (μ, σ) needed; linear transformations remain normal; multi-level aggregation requires no re-modeling |
Specific Financial Applications:
| Domain | Application | Normality Property Used |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Management | VaR (Value at Risk) calculation | Quantile formula μ + z·σ |
| Derivatives Pricing | Black-Scholes option pricing model | Log-return normality assumption |
| Asset Allocation | Markowitz mean-variance model | Return normality + variance as risk measure |
| Performance Attribution | t-test (alpha significance) | Residual normality |
| Monte Carlo Simulation | Generating random scenarios | Sampling from N(μ, σ²) |
⚠️ Reality Check: Real financial data often exhibit fat tails, meaning extreme events occur more frequently than the normal distribution predicts. The 2008 financial crisis powerfully demonstrated the limitations of the normality assumption. Nevertheless, the normal distribution remains the logical starting point for all financial models.
2.6 Normal vs. Other Common Distributions
| Distribution | Symmetry | Skewness | Tail Behavior | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal N(μ, σ²) | Symmetric | 0 | Standard tails | Baseline return model |
| Lognormal | Right-skewed | > 0 | Thicker right tail | Asset prices (always non-negative) |
| t-distribution | Symmetric | 0 | Fat tails | Small-sample hypothesis testing |
| Chi-square | Right-skewed | > 0 | Thicker right tail | Variance testing |
L122 will cover the lognormal distribution in detail. Key insight: Prices → lognormal, Returns → normal.
3. Key Formula Cheat Sheet
| Concept | Formula | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Normal notation | X ~ N(μ, σ²) | General |
| 68–95–99.7 Rule | μ ± kσ, k = 1, 2, 3 | Quick probability estimation |
| Linear transform aX+b | N(aμ+b, a²σ²) | Scaling / translation |
| Sum of independent normals | N(μ₁+μ₂, σ₁²+σ₂²) | Aggregation / portfolios |
| Difference of independent normals | N(μ₁−μ₂, σ₁²+σ₂²) | Spread distribution |
4. Common Pitfalls
| ❌ Mistake | ✅ Correct |
|---|---|
| Assuming all financial data are normal | Real returns often exhibit fat tails and skewness; normality is a starting point, not the truth |
| Writing variance of X−Y as σₓ² − σᵧ² | Variance is always σₓ² + σᵧ² (when independent), regardless of ± |
| Using 68–95–99.7 for exact probabilities | These are approximations! Exact values require a z-table (covered in L121) |
| Forgetting σ² is variance, σ is standard deviation | N(μ, σ²)—the second parameter is variance, not standard deviation |
| Confusing normal with lognormal | Returns ~ normal; Prices ~ lognormal |
5. Practice Test
[Questions]
Q1 (Concept) Which of the following statements about the normal distribution N(μ, σ²) is incorrect?
A. The distribution is perfectly symmetric about the mean μ
B. The mode of the distribution equals μ
C. The skewness of the distribution is 0
D. The density function f(x) intersects the horizontal axis at x = μ ± 2σ
Q2 (Calculation) A stock's weekly return follows a normal distribution N(0.3%, 1.6%²). Using the 68–95–99.7 rule, the probability that the weekly return falls between −2.9% and 3.5% is closest to:
A. 68%
B. 90%
C. 95%
D. 99.7%
Q3 (Calculation) Given X ~ N(50, 64) and Y ~ N(30, 36), with X and Y independent, find the variance of 2X − Y:
A. 128
B. 156
C. 292
D. 292 × √2
Q4 (Concept) An analyst finds that for a fund's monthly return distribution, the mean = 1.2% and the median = 0.8%. This best indicates:
A. The fund's returns follow a normal distribution
B. The fund's return distribution is negatively skewed (left-skewed)
C. The fund's return distribution is positively skewed (right-skewed)
D. The fund's return volatility is negative
[Answers & Explanations]
A1: D
- A ✅ Normal distribution is perfectly symmetric—correct
- B ✅ Mode = μ (bell peaks at the center)—correct
- C ✅ Symmetry ⇒ skewness = 0—correct
- D ❌ The normal curve is asymptotic to the horizontal axis—it never actually touches it! This is the asymptotic tail property
A2: C — 95%
Calculation: - μ = 0.3%, σ = 1.6% - Lower bound: −2.9% = 0.3% − 2 × 1.6% = μ − 2σ - Upper bound: 3.5% = 0.3% + 2 × 1.6% = μ + 2σ - μ ± 2σ covers approximately 95%
🧠 Key technique: When you see interval boundaries, first express them as μ ± kσ, then match to 68/95/99.7.
A3: C — 292
Calculation: - Var(2X) = 2² × Var(X) = 4 × 64 = 256 - Var(−Y) = (−1)² × Var(Y) = 1 × 36 = 36 - Var(2X − Y) = Var(2X) + Var(−Y) = 256 + 36 = 292
⚠️ Note: Variance of 2X − Y = 4σₓ² + σᵧ². It is addition, never subtraction!
A4: C — Positively skewed (right-skewed)
- Mean (1.2%) > Median (0.8%) indicates a longer tail on the right side of the distribution
- This means a few high-return months have pulled the mean upward
- Positive (right) skew ⇒ the direction of skewness matches the direction of the tail
- A ❌ Normal distribution has mean = median
- B ❌ Negative skew would have mean < median
- D ❌ Volatility cannot be negative
📚 Next Lesson L121: Standard Normal Distribution & z-Score—how to use z-tables to compute exact probabilities for any interval