Standard II — Integrity of Capital Markets Module 1 · 15-20% Weight Lesson 131

📖 假设检验导论:原假设与备择假设

CFA Level I · L131 · Introduction to Hypothesis Testing: Null and Alternative Hypotheses

定量方法(Quantitative Methods)— 假设检验 · 第 1 课


一、从"估计"到"判断":为什么需要假设检验?

在前六课(L125-L130)中,我们学会了: - 用样本均值 x̄ 估计总体均值 μ(点估计) - 用置信区间给出 μ 的合理范围(区间估计)

但现实世界中,我们经常需要做决策,而不仅仅是"估计一个范围":

🔹 "这只基金的年化收益率是否真的超过了基准的 8%?" 🔹 "新药的效果是否显著优于安慰剂?" 🔹 "两种投资策略的收益是否有本质差异?"

这些问题需要的不是"μ 大概在哪个区间",而是"我们能不能下结论说 μ > 8%"。

这就是假设检验的用武之地。


二、假设检验的核心思想

2.1 一个生活类比 💡

想象你是一个法官:

法庭场景 统计对应
被告「无罪」是默认假设 原假设 H₀
检方主张「有罪」 备择假设 Hₐ
检方必须提供「足够证据」才能推翻无罪假设 需要足够强的样本证据才能拒绝 H₀
证据不足 → 维持无罪 证据不足 → 不拒绝 H₀
证据充分 → 判有罪 证据充分 → 拒绝 H₀,接受 Hₐ
可能冤枉无辜(Type I 错误) 可能错误拒绝 H₀(Type I 错误)
可能放过罪犯(Type II 错误) 可能错误不拒绝 H₀(Type II 错误)

🎯 关键原则:假设检验的逻辑是"反证法"——我们先假设 H₀ 为真,然后看样本数据是否提供了足够强的矛盾证据来推翻它。

2.2 核心三要素

要素 说明
原假设 H₀ 我们想要推翻的"现状假设",通常包含等号(=, ≤, ≥)
备择假设 Hₐ 我们想要证明的"研究主张",通常不含等号(≠, >, <)
检验统计量 + 决策规则 基于样本数据计算一个值,判断是否拒绝 H₀

三、原假设 H₀(Null Hypothesis)

3.1 定义

原假设 H₀ 是被假定为真的陈述,只有样本提供了「足够强的反面证据」时,我们才拒绝它。

3.2 为什么叫 "Null"?

"Null" 意味着「无效果、无差异、无变化」——它代表现状、保守立场。

场景 H₀ 的含义
检验均值是否等于某个值 H₀: μ = μ₀(与目标值无差异)
检验新药是否有效 H₀: 新药效果 = 安慰剂效果(无差异)
检验两种策略是否相同 H₀: μ₁ = μ₂(两种策略收益率相同)
检验是否正态分布 H₀: 数据服从正态分布(无偏离)

3.3 H₀ 总是包含等号

这是 CFA 一级的硬规则:

✅ H₀: μ = 10     ✅ H₀: μ ≤ 10     ✅ H₀: μ ≥ 10
❌ H₀: μ ≠ 10     ❌ H₀: μ < 10      ❌ H₀: μ > 10

🔑 原因:检验的逻辑需要「在 H₀ 为真的条件下」计算概率(p 值)。等号让 H₀ 成为一个精确的、可计算的基准。


四、备择假设 Hₐ(Alternative Hypothesis)

4.1 定义

备择假设 Hₐ 是当样本证据足够强时,我们倾向于接受的结论。它代表了研究者真正想证明的主张。

4.2 Hₐ 永远不含等号

✅ Hₐ: μ ≠ 10     ✅ Hₐ: μ > 10      ✅ Hₐ: μ < 10
❌ Hₐ: μ = 10     ❌ Hₐ: μ ≥ 10      ❌ Hₐ: μ ≤ 10

4.3 三种形式的 Hₐ 决定了检验方向

Hₐ 形式 检验类型 拒绝域位置 英文
μ ≠ μ₀ 双尾检验 左右两边各 α/2 Two-tailed test
μ > μ₀ 右尾检验 右侧 α Right-tailed test
μ < μ₀ 左尾检验 左侧 α Left-tailed test

📌 双尾 vs 单尾的选择不是随意的——它由研究问题决定,不是看完数据后再选!(这是 CFA 重点考点)


五、如何设立假设:实战三步法

步骤 ①:找出你想证明的「主张」

把这个主张写成不含等号的形式 → 这就是 Hₐ 的雏形。

步骤 ②:H₀ 是 Hₐ 的「互补」

把 Hₐ 的 ≠ / > / < 改为互补的 = / ≤ / ≥,并包含等号。

步骤 ③:验证 H₀ 含等号、Hₐ 不含等号


📌 案例 1:基金经理业绩

场景: 某基金经理声称其年化收益率超过行业平均的 8%。你想验证这个说法。

步骤 操作
① 主张 该基金收益率不等于一般水平,具体是 大于 8%
② Hₐ Hₐ: μ > 8%(你想证明的事)
③ H₀ H₀: μ ≤ 8%(默认立场:不比他声称的高)

⚠️ 注意:如果问题只是"验证是否等于 8%",则 Hₐ: μ ≠ 8%,H₀: μ = 8%

📌 案例 2:质量控制

场景: 某工厂声称产品平均重量为 500g。质检部门要检验该声称是否属实。

步骤 操作
① 主张 不一定是 500g → 可能是任何不等于 500 的值
② Hₐ Hₐ: μ ≠ 500g(双尾:可能偏高或偏低)
③ H₀ H₀: μ = 500g

📌 案例 3:效果检验(左尾)

场景: 新流程宣称能减少操作时间,目标是将平均处理时间降到 30 分钟以下。

步骤 操作
① 主张 平均处理时间小于 30 分钟
② Hₐ Hₐ: μ < 30(左尾)
③ H₀ H₀: μ ≥ 30

📌 案例 4:金融实战 —— Sharpe Ratio 检验

场景: 某策略的回测夏普比率 = 0.85。经典观点认为:如果夏普比率 ≤ 0,策略没有超额收益。你想检验该策略是否有正的夏普比率。

步骤 操作
① 主张 策略有正夏普比率
② Hₐ Hₐ: SR > 0(右尾)
③ H₀ H₀: SR ≤ 0("Null" 意味着零超额收益)

六、为什么不能直接"接受 H₀"?

这是 CFA 考试的一个经典陷阱。

6.1 检验只有两种可能结论

结论 含义 类比
拒绝 H₀ 样本证据足够强 → 接受 Hₐ 证据确凿 → 判有罪
不拒绝 H₀ 样本证据不够强 → 维持 H₀ 证据不足 → 无罪释放

6.2 为什么不说「接受 H₀」?

因为"不拒绝"不等于"确认"。

  • 样本量太小 → 即使 H₀ 不成立,也可能不拒绝 H₀(缺乏 power)
  • 不拒绝 H₀ 只是说「目前没有足够证据推翻它」,不等于「H₀ 是对的」
❌ 错误表述:「我们接受 H₀,证明均值等于 10」
✅ 正确表述:「在 5% 显著性水平下,我们不拒绝 H₀」
✅ 更通俗的表述:「数据未能提供足够证据来推翻 H₀」

6.3 CFA 考试要点

🔥 CFA 标准表述永远是 "reject H₀" 或 "fail to reject H₀",绝不出现 "accept H₀"。


七、从问题到假设:常见题型与易错点

7.1 题型一:给定场景,写出假设

例题: 某投行分析师认为科技板块的市盈率与全市场平均值 18x 不同。请写出原假设和备择假设。

解答: - H₀: μ = 18(板块 PE 与市场平均相同) - Hₐ: μ ≠ 18(板块 PE 与市场平均不同) - 检验类型:双尾检验(因为只是说"不同",没说方向)

7.2 题型二:判断是否应该用单尾

措辞 检验方向
"不同"、"是否有差异"、"是否改变" 双尾
"高于"、"超过"、"显著增加"、"有所提升" 右尾(大于)
"低于"、"低于标准"、"有所降低" 左尾(小于)

🔥 中文里"是否高于"、"是否低于"也暗示方向,具体看语境。

7.3 题型三:区分 H₀ 和 Hₐ 的角色

💡 口诀:你想证明的放 Hₐ,需要被反驳的放 H₀

  • 如果你是一家药的研发商,你想证明「新药有效」
  • H₀: 新药无效(μ = 0 或 μ ≤ 0)
  • Hₐ: 新药有效(μ > 0)
  • 如果你是监管机构,你想确保「新药没有副作用」
  • H₀: 新药安全(副作用 ≤ 阈值)
  • Hₐ: 新药不安全(副作用 > 阈值)

🎯 H₀ 和 Hₐ 的设定取决于立场和你试图证明的结论!


八、假设检验的逻辑流程(全貌预览)

1. 提出假设
   H₀: μ = μ₀
   Hₐ: μ ≠ μ₀(或 > / <)

2. 选择显著性水平 α(通常 0.05 或 0.01)
   ↓
3. 收集样本数据 → 计算检验统计量
   例如: z = (x̄ - μ₀) / (σ/√n)
   ↓
4. 计算 p 值 或 比较临界值
   - p < α → 拒绝 H₀ ✅
   - p ≥ α → 不拒绝 H₀
   ↓
5. 做出结论(经济/金融意义上的解读)

📌 本课聚焦于第 1 步(设立假设)。检验统计量、p 值、α 水平的详细讨论将在 L132 展开。


九、课堂练习

📝 Part A:基础概念

Q1. 关于原假设 H₀,以下哪项是正确的?

A. H₀ 是研究者想要证明的主张 B. H₀ 总是包含"≠" C. H₀ 是被假定为真的陈述,除非有足够证据推翻它 D. H₀ 和 Hₐ 可以同时为真

Q2. 假设检验中,"拒绝 H₀"意味着:

A. 证明了 H₀ 是错误的 B. 样本数据提供了足够强的证据反对 H₀ C. H₀ 一定是假的 D. Hₐ 一定是真的

Q3. 以下哪一组假设是正确的?

A. H₀: μ = 5; Hₐ: μ = 6 B. H₀: μ ≠ 5; Hₐ: μ = 5 C. H₀: μ ≤ 5; Hₐ: μ > 5 D. H₀: μ < 5; Hₐ: μ > 5


📝 Part B:假设设置

Q4. 某研究人员想检验一种新的交易策略是否能产生正的超额收益(alpha)。正确的假设是:

A. H₀: alpha ≤ 0; Hₐ: alpha > 0 B. H₀: alpha = 0; Hₐ: alpha ≠ 0 C. H₀: alpha ≥ 0; Hₐ: alpha < 0 D. H₀: alpha < 0; Hₐ: alpha ≥ 0

Q5. 某金融分析师想要测试标准普尔 500 指数的平均年化收益率是否与历史平均值 10% 有所不同。正确的假设是:

A. H₀: μ > 10%; Hₐ: μ ≤ 10% B. H₀: μ = 10%; Hₐ: μ ≠ 10% C. H₀: μ < 10%; Hₐ: μ ≥ 10% D. H₀: μ ≤ 10%; Hₐ: μ > 10%

Q6. 某银行想验证新审批系统是否将平均审批时间缩短到 3 天以下。正确的假设是:

A. H₀: μ ≥ 3; Hₐ: μ < 3 B. H₀: μ = 3; Hₐ: μ ≠ 3 C. H₀: μ ≤ 3; Hₐ: μ > 3 D. H₀: μ > 3; Hₐ: μ < 3


📝 Part C:综合判断

Q7. CFA 协会准则建议,在进行假设检验时,分析师的结论表述应该:

A. "接受 H₀"或"拒绝 H₀" B. "接受 Hₐ"或"拒绝 Hₐ" C. "拒绝 H₀"或"不拒绝 H₀" D. "证明 H₀"或"证伪 H₀"

Q8. 以下哪种情况最适合使用双尾检验?

A. 检验新药是否比旧药更好 B. 检验产品重量是否低于标准值 C. 检验某指数收益率是否与基准不同 D. 检验员工的平均加班时间是否超过 10 小时

Q9. 关于 H₀ 和 Hₐ 的关系,以下哪项是错误的?

A. H₀ 和 Hₐ 是互斥的 B. H₀ 和 Hₐ 共同覆盖所有可能取值 C. H₀ 总是代表研究人员想要推翻的假设 D. 在实际操作中,我们可以同时接受 H₀ 和 Hₐ

Q10. 某投资组合经理声称其组合的夏普比率大于 1.0。验证这一声称时,H₀ 应设为:

A. H₀: SR = 1.0 B. H₀: SR ≤ 1.0 C. H₀: SR ≥ 1.0 D. H₀: SR > 1.0


十、答案与解析

Part A:基础概念

Q1. 答案:C

H₀ 是"被假定为真的基线陈述",只有样本证据足够强时才拒绝。A 是 Hₐ 的定义;B 错了(H₀ 含等号,Hₐ 不含等号);D 错了(H₀ 和 Hₐ 互斥)。

Q2. 答案:B

拒绝 H₀ 意味着样本数据与 H₀ 之间的矛盾已经大到不太可能是随机波动造成的。但这不等于"证明"——统计推断永远不能说 100% 确定。

Q3. 答案:C

H₀ 含等号(≤),Hₐ 不含等号(>)。A 错在 Hₐ 有 =;B 错在 H₀ 有 ≠;D 错在 H₀ 和 Hₐ 都无等号,且未覆盖全部可能取值。


Part B:假设设置

Q4. 答案:A

想证明"正的超额收益" → Hₐ: alpha > 0。H₀ 取互补且含等号 → H₀: alpha ≤ 0。

Q5. 答案:B

"是否有所不同" → 双尾检验。H₀: μ = 10%; Hₐ: μ ≠ 10%。没有方向性暗示,不能用单尾。

Q6. 答案:A

想证明"缩短到 3 天以下" → 方向是"小于" → Hₐ: μ < 3。因此 H₀: μ ≥ 3。


Part C:综合判断

Q7. 答案:C

CFA 准则:永远只说"reject H₀"或"fail to reject H₀",绝不说"accept H₀"。

Q8. 答案:C

"是否与基准不同" → 无方向的差异 → 双尾。A 和 D 有方向性(更好/超过),B 也是方向性的。

Q9. 答案:D

H₀ 和 Hₐ 不能同时被接受——它们是互斥且穷尽的。D 的错误在于"同时接受",这在统计上是不可能的。

Q10. 答案:B

经理声称 SR > 1.0 → 你想推翻的是"SR ≤ 1.0"(默认立场)。所以 H₀: SR ≤ 1.0。这是典型的"验证超常表现"场景,将声称的反面设为 H₀。


十一、本课要点总结

要点 关键内容
假设检验的本质 反证法——假设 H₀ 为真,寻找矛盾证据
H₀ 规则 总是包含等号(=, ≤, ≥),代表"现状/无差异"
Hₐ 规则 总是不含等号(≠, >, <),代表"研究主张"
双尾 vs 单尾 由研究问题事先决定,不能看完数据再选
结论表述 只能说"拒绝 H₀"或"不拒绝 H₀",不能说"接受 H₀"
H₀ / Hₐ 设定 你想证明的放 Hₐ,默认立场放 H₀;立场决定设定

十二、下节预告:L132

下一课我们将深入 p 值、显著性水平 α 与第一类/第二类错误——回答"样本证据要强到什么程度,才算'足够强'?"这个核心问题。


📊 本节 CFA 学习量: ~25 分钟阅读 + 10 道练习题

🏆 恭喜!你已完成 L131,明天见 L132!


CFA Level I · Quantitative Methods · Hypothesis Testing · Lesson 1 Generated for Ivan 哥 on 2026-08-06

Quantitative Methods — Hypothesis Testing · Lesson 1


1. From "Estimation" to "Decision": Why Hypothesis Testing?

In the previous six lessons (L125–L130), we learned how to: - Estimate the population mean μ using the sample mean x̄ (point estimation) - Construct a confidence interval to capture μ's plausible range (interval estimation)

But in the real world, we often need to make decisions, not just "estimate a range":

🔹 "Does this fund's annual return truly exceed the benchmark of 8%?" 🔹 "Is the new drug significantly more effective than the placebo?" 🔹 "Is there a fundamental difference between the returns of two investment strategies?"

These questions require not "what range is μ likely in?" but "can we conclude that μ > 8%?"

This is where hypothesis testing comes in.


2. The Core Idea of Hypothesis Testing

2.1 A Real-Life Analogy 💡

Imagine you are a judge:

Courtroom Scenario Statistical Counterpart
Defendant is "innocent" by default Null Hypothesis H₀
Prosecutor claims "guilty" Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ
Prosecutor must provide "sufficient evidence" to overturn innocence Sample evidence must be strong enough to reject H₀
Insufficient evidence → maintain innocence Insufficient evidence → fail to reject H₀
Sufficient evidence → convict Sufficient evidence → reject H₀, accept Hₐ
May convict the innocent (Type I Error) May incorrectly reject H₀ (Type I Error)
May acquit the guilty (Type II Error) May incorrectly fail to reject H₀ (Type II Error)

🎯 Key Principle: Hypothesis testing uses the logic of "proof by contradiction" — we first assume H₀ is true, then check whether the sample data provides sufficiently strong contradictory evidence to overturn it.

2.2 The Three Core Elements

Element Description
Null Hypothesis H₀ The "status quo" assumption we seek to overturn; always contains an equality (=, ≤, ≥)
Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ The "research claim" we seek to prove; never contains an equality (≠, >, <)
Test Statistic + Decision Rule Compute a value from sample data, then decide whether to reject H₀

3. The Null Hypothesis H₀

3.1 Definition

The null hypothesis H₀ is the statement assumed to be true; we reject it only if the sample provides "sufficiently strong evidence to the contrary."

3.2 Why Is It Called "Null"?

"Null" means "no effect, no difference, no change" — it represents the status quo, the conservative stance.

Scenario What H₀ Means
Testing whether a mean equals a target H₀: μ = μ₀ (no difference from target)
Testing whether a new drug works H₀: drug effect = placebo effect (no difference)
Testing whether two strategies are equal H₀: μ₁ = μ₂ (same returns)
Testing for normality H₀: data follow a normal distribution (no deviation)

3.3 H₀ Always Contains an Equality

This is a hard rule at CFA Level I:

✅ H₀: μ = 10     ✅ H₀: μ ≤ 10     ✅ H₀: μ ≥ 10
❌ H₀: μ ≠ 10     ❌ H₀: μ < 10      ❌ H₀: μ > 10

🔑 Reason: Testing requires computing probabilities (p-values) "under the assumption that H₀ is true." The equality gives H₀ a precise, computable benchmark.


4. The Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ

4.1 Definition

The alternative hypothesis Hₐ is the conclusion we lean toward when sample evidence is strong enough. It represents the claim the researcher genuinely wants to prove.

4.2 Hₐ Never Contains an Equality

✅ Hₐ: μ ≠ 10     ✅ Hₐ: μ > 10      ✅ Hₐ: μ < 10
❌ Hₐ: μ = 10     ❌ Hₐ: μ ≥ 10      ❌ Hₐ: μ ≤ 10

4.3 The Three Forms of Hₐ Determine the Test Direction

Hₐ Form Test Type Rejection Region
μ ≠ μ₀ Two-tailed test α/2 in each tail
μ > μ₀ Right-tailed test α in the right tail
μ < μ₀ Left-tailed test α in the left tail

📌 The choice between two-tailed and one-tailed is NOT arbitrary — it is dictated by the research question, never chosen after seeing the data! (This is a key CFA exam point.)


5. How to Set Up Hypotheses: A Three-Step Practical Method

Step ①: Identify the "Claim" You Want to Prove

Write this claim in a form that does NOT contain an equality → this becomes your Hₐ candidate.

Step ②: H₀ Is the "Complement" of Hₐ

Replace Hₐ's ≠ / > / < with the complementary = / ≤ / ≥, ensuring H₀ contains an equality.

Step ③: Verify: H₀ contains equality; Hₐ does not


Example 1: Fund Manager Performance

Scenario: A fund manager claims their annual return exceeds the industry average of 8%. You want to test this claim.

Step Action
① Claim The fund return is not equal to the average; specifically, it is > 8%
② Hₐ Hₐ: μ > 8% (what you want to prove)
③ H₀ H₀: μ ≤ 8% (default position: not higher than claimed)

⚠️ Note: If the question were simply "test whether it equals 8%," then Hₐ: μ ≠ 8%, H₀: μ = 8%.

Example 2: Quality Control

Scenario: A factory claims its products weigh 500g on average. The quality inspection department wants to test this claim.

Step Action
① Claim Not necessarily 500g → could be any value different from 500
② Hₐ Hₐ: μ ≠ 500g (two-tailed: could be higher or lower)
③ H₀ H₀: μ = 500g

Example 3: Process Improvement (Left-Tailed)

Scenario: A new process claims to reduce processing time, targeting an average below 30 minutes.

Step Action
① Claim Average processing time < 30 minutes
② Hₐ Hₐ: μ < 30 (left-tailed)
③ H₀ H₀: μ ≥ 30

Example 4: Finance in Practice — Sharpe Ratio Test

Scenario: A strategy's backtested Sharpe ratio is 0.85. The classical view: if SR ≤ 0, the strategy has no excess return. You want to test whether the strategy has a positive Sharpe ratio.

Step Action
① Claim Strategy has a positive Sharpe ratio
② Hₐ Hₐ: SR > 0 (right-tailed)
③ H₀ H₀: SR ≤ 0 ("Null" means zero excess return)

6. Why Can't We Ever "Accept H₀"?

This is a classic CFA exam trap.

6.1 Only Two Possible Conclusions

Conclusion Meaning Analogy
Reject H₀ Sample evidence is strong enough → accept Hₐ Evidence conclusive → convict
Fail to Reject H₀ Sample evidence is not strong enough → maintain H₀ Insufficient evidence → acquit

6.2 Why Not Say "Accept H₀"?

Because "failing to reject" ≠ "confirming."

  • Small sample size → may fail to reject H₀ even if it is false (lack of power)
  • Failing to reject H₀ only means "there is currently not enough evidence to overturn it" — it does NOT mean "H₀ is true"
❌ Wrong: "We accept H₀, proving the mean equals 10"
✅ Correct: "At the 5% significance level, we fail to reject H₀"
✅ Plain English: "The data did not provide sufficient evidence to overturn H₀"

6.3 CFA Exam Takeaway

🔥 CFA standard phrasing is always "reject H₀" or "fail to reject H₀" — never "accept H₀."


7. From Question to Hypothesis: Common Exam Items and Pitfalls

7.1 Type 1: Write Hypotheses for a Given Scenario

Example: An investment bank analyst believes the P/E ratio of the tech sector differs from the market-wide average of 18x. State the null and alternative hypotheses.

Solution: - H₀: μ = 18 (sector P/E is the same as the market average) - Hₐ: μ ≠ 18 (sector P/E is different from the market average) - Test type: Two-tailed test (because "differs" carries no directional implication)

7.2 Type 2: Determine Whether to Use a One-Tailed Test

Wording Test Direction
"differs," "is there a difference," "has changed" Two-tailed
"higher than," "exceeds," "significantly increased," "improved" Right-tailed (greater than)
"lower than," "below standard," "decreased" Left-tailed (less than)

7.3 Type 3: Distinguishing the Roles of H₀ and Hₐ

💡 Mnemonic: What you want to prove goes in Hₐ; what needs to be refuted goes in H₀

  • If you are a drug developer and want to prove "the new drug works":
  • H₀: Drug is ineffective (μ = 0 or μ ≤ 0)
  • Hₐ: Drug is effective (μ > 0)
  • If you are a regulator and want to ensure "the new drug has no side effects":
  • H₀: Drug is safe (side effects ≤ threshold)
  • Hₐ: Drug is unsafe (side effects > threshold)

🎯 H₀ and Hₐ depend on your standpoint and the conclusion you are trying to prove!


8. The Hypothesis Testing Logical Flow (Preview)

1. State hypotheses
   H₀: μ = μ₀
   Hₐ: μ ≠ μ₀ (or > / <)

2. Choose significance level α (typically 0.05 or 0.01)
   ↓
3. Collect sample data → compute test statistic
   e.g., z = (x̄ − μ₀) / (σ/√n)
   ↓
4. Compute p-value or compare to critical value
   − p < α → reject H₀ ✅
   − p ≥ α → fail to reject H₀
   ↓
5. Draw conclusions (economic/financial interpretation)

📌 This lesson focuses on Step 1 (setting up hypotheses). Test statistics, p-values, and α levels will be covered in detail in L132.


9. Practice Questions

📝 Part A: Basic Concepts

Q1. Which of the following is true about the null hypothesis H₀?

A. H₀ is the claim the researcher wants to prove B. H₀ always contains "≠" C. H₀ is the statement assumed true unless sufficient evidence contradicts it D. H₀ and Hₐ can both be true simultaneously

Q2. In hypothesis testing, "rejecting H₀" means:

A. Proving that H₀ is false B. The sample data provide sufficiently strong evidence against H₀ C. H₀ is definitely false D. Hₐ is definitely true

Q3. Which of the following pairs of hypotheses is correctly specified?

A. H₀: μ = 5; Hₐ: μ = 6 B. H₀: μ ≠ 5; Hₐ: μ = 5 C. H₀: μ ≤ 5; Hₐ: μ > 5 D. H₀: μ < 5; Hₐ: μ > 5


📝 Part B: Hypothesis Setup

Q4. A researcher wants to test whether a new trading strategy generates positive excess returns (alpha). The correct hypotheses are:

A. H₀: alpha ≤ 0; Hₐ: alpha > 0 B. H₀: alpha = 0; Hₐ: alpha ≠ 0 C. H₀: alpha ≥ 0; Hₐ: alpha < 0 D. H₀: alpha < 0; Hₐ: alpha ≥ 0

Q5. A financial analyst wants to test whether the average annual return of the S&P 500 index differs from the historical average of 10%. The correct hypotheses are:

A. H₀: μ > 10%; Hₐ: μ ≤ 10% B. H₀: μ = 10%; Hₐ: μ ≠ 10% C. H₀: μ < 10%; Hₐ: μ ≥ 10% D. H₀: μ ≤ 10%; Hₐ: μ > 10%

Q6. A bank wants to verify whether a new approval system has reduced the average processing time to below 3 days. The correct hypotheses are:

A. H₀: μ ≥ 3; Hₐ: μ < 3 B. H₀: μ = 3; Hₐ: μ ≠ 3 C. H₀: μ ≤ 3; Hₐ: μ > 3 D. H₀: μ > 3; Hₐ: μ < 3


📝 Part C: Comprehensive Judgment

Q7. According to CFA Institute guidance, when conducting hypothesis tests, an analyst should state conclusions as:

A. "Accept H₀" or "reject H₀" B. "Accept Hₐ" or "reject Hₐ" C. "Reject H₀" or "fail to reject H₀" D. "Prove H₀" or "disprove H₀"

Q8. Which of the following situations is most appropriate for a two-tailed test?

A. Testing whether a new drug is better than an old one B. Testing whether a product's weight is below the standard C. Testing whether an index's return differs from the benchmark D. Testing whether employees' average overtime exceeds 10 hours

Q9. Regarding the relationship between H₀ and Hₐ, which of the following is INCORRECT?

A. H₀ and Hₐ are mutually exclusive B. H₀ and Hₐ together cover all possible values C. H₀ always represents the hypothesis the researcher wants to overturn D. In practice, we can simultaneously accept both H₀ and Hₐ

Q10. A portfolio manager claims their portfolio's Sharpe ratio is greater than 1.0. To test this claim, H₀ should be set as:

A. H₀: SR = 1.0 B. H₀: SR ≤ 1.0 C. H₀: SR ≥ 1.0 D. H₀: SR > 1.0


10. Answers and Explanations

Part A: Basic Concepts

Q1. Answer: C

H₀ is the "baseline statement assumed true" and is rejected only when sample evidence is strong enough. A describes Hₐ; B is wrong (H₀ contains equality, Hₐ does not); D is wrong (H₀ and Hₐ are mutually exclusive).

Q2. Answer: B

Rejecting H₀ means the contradiction between sample data and H₀ is too large to be attributed to random variation alone. This does not equal "proof" — statistical inference can never claim 100% certainty.

Q3. Answer: C

H₀ contains equality (≤), Hₐ does not (>). A is wrong because Hₐ includes =; B is wrong because H₀ includes ≠; D is wrong because neither H₀ nor Hₐ contains equality and they fail to cover all possible values.


Part B: Hypothesis Setup

Q4. Answer: A

Goal: prove "positive excess returns" → Hₐ: alpha > 0. H₀ takes the complement with equality → H₀: alpha ≤ 0.

Q5. Answer: B

"Differs from" → two-tailed test. H₀: μ = 10%; Hₐ: μ ≠ 10%. No directional implication → cannot use one-tailed.

Q6. Answer: A

Goal: prove "reduced to below 3 days" → direction is "less than" → Hₐ: μ < 3. Therefore H₀: μ ≥ 3.


Part C: Comprehensive Judgment

Q7. Answer: C

CFA standard: always say "reject H₀" or "fail to reject H₀," never "accept H₀."

Q8. Answer: C

"Differs from the benchmark" → a difference without direction → two-tailed. A and D are directional (better / exceeds), B is also directional.

Q9. Answer: D

H₀ and Hₐ cannot both be accepted simultaneously — they are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. D's error lies in "simultaneously accept," which is statistically impossible.

Q10. Answer: B

Manager claims SR > 1.0 → what you want to overturn is "SR ≤ 1.0" (the default position). So H₀: SR ≤ 1.0. This is the classic "verify exceptional performance" scenario: set the opposite of the claim as H₀.


11. Key Takeaways

Takeaway Core Content
Essence of hypothesis testing Proof by contradiction — assume H₀ is true, then look for contradictory evidence
H₀ rule Always contains an equality (=, ≤, ≥); represents "status quo / no difference"
Hₐ rule Never contains an equality (≠, >, <); represents the "research claim"
Two-tailed vs. one-tailed Determined by the research question beforehand — never chosen after seeing data
Conclusion phrasing Only say "reject H₀" or "fail to reject H₀"; never say "accept H₀"
H₀ / Hₐ setup What you want to prove → Hₐ; default position → H₀; standpoint matters

12. Next Lesson Preview: L132

In the next lesson, we dive into p-values, significance level α, and Type I / Type II errors — answering the core question: "How strong does sample evidence need to be to qualify as 'strong enough'?"


📊 CFA Study Load for This Lesson: ~25 minutes reading + 10 practice questions

🏆 Congratulations! You've completed L131. See you tomorrow for L132!


CFA Level I · Quantitative Methods · Hypothesis Testing · Lesson 1 Generated for Ivan on 2026-08-06

🔜 下一课 · L132

CFA 一级 · L132 · 检验统计量、p 值与显著性水平 — 一、上节课回顾:从假设到判断 · 二、检验统计量(Test Statistic) · 三、显著性水平 α(Significance Le